Geobiology in Architecture: Distinguishing Between Science and Wellness Marketing

Geobiology is increasingly appearing in architectural discussions, often presented as a method to enhance well-being and harmony in living and working spaces. But what really lies behind this term? Is it a rigorous scientific discipline or a spiritual concept used for marketing purposes? This article explores geobiology in connection with traditional practices like feng shui and vashtu shastra, while emphasizing the importance of distinguishing what is scientifically proven from what pertains to the pursuit of well-being.

An important note: as a scientist by training, with experience in engineering and a career in the industry, I find it difficult to adhere to the claims of geobiology, which lack any solid empirical foundation. However, this article does not aim to discredit the legitimate aspiration for well-being, particularly within architecture. Through the enthusiasm for this discipline, I see, above all, a growing interest in sustainable, livable, and environmentally respectful architecture. This is the eagerness I wish to highlight, as it reflects essential values that deserve to be acknowledged and developed!

Ancient Roots: Feng Shui and Vashtu Shastra

Although geobiology is often presented as a modern concept, its roots go back to traditional practices that aimed to optimize spaces based on natural and energetic forces. In China, feng shui focuses on arranging rooms to channel energy flows (the “chi”) harmoniously. Similarly, in India, vashtu shastra offers construction principles that align buildings with natural elements to promote prosperity and health.

These practices demonstrate that concerns about spatial harmony and occupant well-being have always existed. However, they were based on belief systems and a worldview that differ from modern scientific approaches.

A Definition of Geobiology

Geobiology is presented as a discipline that seeks to study the interactions between locations, natural energies, and the well-being of building occupants. It is based on the idea that certain invisible phenomena, such as telluric networks (Hartmann and Curry lines), underground water currents, or natural electromagnetic fields, influence the energy of spaces and, consequently, the health and well-being of individuals.

According to geobiology practitioners, it is possible to detect and correct these influences using practices such as dowsing rods, the placement of specific materials, or the rearrangement of spaces based on identified energy flows. These concepts are similar to ancient traditions like feng shui in China or vashtu shastra in India, where the orientation and layout of spaces aim to channel positive energies.

However, it is important to note that none of these concepts are based on solid scientific foundations. The measurements and techniques used in geobiology lack empirical validation recognized by the scientific community. Therefore, it is advisable to remain cautious about these approaches, which, although appealing, cannot be proven or verified in a rigorous manner.

Geobiology and Sustainable Architecture: A Natural Association?

In the current context of sustainable architecture, certain elements of geobiology may appear aligned with architects’ concerns. For example, optimizing building orientation to maximize natural light or selecting healthy and eco-friendly materials fits within a sustainability framework. These practices, sometimes associated with geobiology, have scientific foundations and contribute to enhancing occupant comfort.

However, other aspects of geobiology, such as identifying “energy points” or measuring telluric influences, are based on approaches that have not been scientifically proven. It is therefore crucial to differentiate between what is grounded in concrete data and what is more akin to a spiritual or esoteric belief.

Science and Spirituality: A Deliberate Confusion

While geobiology is sometimes used to justify architectural or design choices, it is essential to recognize the boundary between a scientific approach and a spiritual practice. These two perspectives are not mutually exclusive, but they should not be confused. A spiritual approach can enrich a project by adding a personal or cultural dimension that resonates with a building’s occupants. However, it is crucial that this dimension is presented as such and not marketed as “science” to attract clients seeking well-being.

This confusion is sometimes deliberately or unintentionally maintained by certain practitioners or companies who use the term “geobiology” as a marketing tool. By implying that their approach is scientific, they capitalize on the growing interest in well-being solutions and sustainable architecture, while exploiting the public’s uncertainty about the discipline’s true foundations.

The Architect’s Role: Relying on Concrete Data

For architects, it is crucial to differentiate between approaches and rely on practices validated by scientific data when it comes to sustainable design or well-being. Natural light, air quality, acoustics, and the use of healthy materials are measurable and can be optimized using reliable tools. These approaches yield concrete results and allow architects to justify their choices to clients based on facts.

Conclusion: An Equitable and Transparent Approach

While geobiology, feng shui, or vashtu shastra can enrich a project by adding a cultural or symbolic dimension, it is essential to maintain a balanced approach. Architects must be transparent about the nature of these influences, explaining that they are complementary practices, distinct from purely scientific approaches. This way, they can offer clients designs that combine well-being, sustainability, and authenticity, while avoiding the pitfalls of misleading wellness marketing.

For Further Reading

To deepen your understanding of well-being in architecture and the issues related to built environments, here is a selection of resources and scientific articles that explore these topics:

1. “Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience” – This article explores how architecture influences our emotional and cognitive well-being through the lens of neuroarchitecture. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience – MIT Press Direct.
2. “Architecture and Health: How Spaces Can Impact Our Emotional Well-Being” – An analysis of the impact of built environments on mental health and occupant well-being, with a focus on the psychology of space – ArchDaily
3. “Neuroarchitecture: How the Built Environment Influences the Human Brain” – Neuroarchitecture, a discipline studying the impact of the environment on the brain and human behavior, aims to create healthier interior spaces conducive to well-being, productivity, and cognitive performance, using a literature review to demonstrate how architecture affects emotions, decision-making, and physiological states. – ResearchGate.
4. Neuroarchitecture and the Potential of the Built Environment for Brain Health and Creativity” – This article examines how enriched architecture can stimulate creativity and brain health using data-driven approaches – ArchDaily.
5. “Exploring Biophilic Design and Its Implications for Mental Health” – A study on biophilic design and its effects on mental health, incorporating natural elements to enhance occupant well-being. – SpringerLink.
6. “Biophilia and Healing Environments: Principles for Designing the Built World” – A resource that explores how biophilic design can create healthy environments optimized for human well-being. Terrapin Bright Green.
7. “Attention Restoration Theory: A Systematic Review of the Attention Restoration Potential of Exposure to Natural Environments” – A systematic review of the restorative effects of natural environments on concentration and mental health – Taylor & Francis Online.
8. “The Importance of Environmental Psychology in the Design of Educational Spaces” – This article focuses on the influence of environmental psychology in designing spaces that promote well-being and productivity – ResearchGate.
9. “Healthy Cities and the City Planning Process” – A report by the WHO on the impact of urban planning on public health, emphasizing the importance of well-thought-out and sustainable architecture. – WHO Europe.